🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based citizen has been found guilty of uploading nude segments from protected movies and television shows on the social media site Reddit.

According to a police report reviewed by BBC News, the unnamed man posted 347 video excerpts of nude content in a subreddit he managed, which were then watched 4.2 million times.

The country's authorities state he has been handed a 7-month suspended jail term for copyright infringement.

Legal analysts explain the defendant was charged under a seldom-invoked clause in Danish copyright law, with the judge ruling that by removing the footage out of their original context, the accused had harmed the artists' "moral rights".

He has additionally been found guilty of sharing more than 25 TB of copyrighted digital content.

From spring 2022 to May 2023, the man using the alias "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted adult clips featuring over 100 actresses.

He distributed them in the subreddit he was a administrator of.

Per the Denmark's anti-piracy group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 members and participants were encouraged to ask for clips of specific performers.

In 2023, campaigners filed the case to the authorities on behalf of the impacted artists, directors and producers, which resulted in the forum being closed down.

One actress, one of the actresses whose nude content were shared in the community, explained to Danish broadcasters at the time she felt there was a difference between being seen unclothed in a film and appearing on Reddit.

The performer said the uploads constituted "exploitation".

'An important message'

The defendant was arrested in fall 2024 and admitted guilty to the allegations last month.

In a statement after the verdict, TRA head the organization's leader said the outcome sent an "significant" signal "that violations of creators' entitlements have repercussions".

The verdict is viewed as unique in Denmark for its use of the "ethical protections" section of the national copyright law, which specifies an creator's work cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their reputation.

Copyright law expert a legal scholar told BBC News the legal matter was "rare" for its emphasis on the harm to the integrity of an artist, rather than to them financially.

How the ruling could affect other countries is uncertain.

But she said there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the coming years with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the sanctity of one's work might be tempered with much more easily".